'Political evolution needed, parties shouldn't punish voters with lack of allocations'

SHAH ALAM - Political expert views the Opposition’s abrupt halt in negotiations with the government for allocations as premature and potentially harmful to the constituents they represent.

According to National Professor Council senior fellow Datuk Dr Jeniri Amir, Perikatan Nasional (PN) should remain open to discussion and be ready to adhere to the government’s guidelines.

Jeniri contends that this abrupt halt could jeopardise development in the regions represented by PN due to the absence of allocations.

"The decision was taken without fully considering the consequences for both the party and the people, particularly in PN-controlled states," he said.

He expressed confidence that PN is aware of the necessity for guidelines in allocation usage, amounts, and distribution mechanisms. However, halting negotiations was a misstep.

"The government's intent is to ensure that the allocation is utilised appropriately and transparently, avoiding misuse for party ends," he added.

Jeniri also highlighted that if Opposition representatives received allocations, they could significantly enhance basic infrastructure and meet other needs for the people's welfare.

"The ideal resolution is for both sides to be receptive and ready to compromise, creating a win-win scenario.

"In the current state, PN and its constituents, especially in PN-governed regions, stand to lose," he stressed.

Nonetheless, Jeniri said that to fulfill their mandate and promises, the Unity Government, and particularly Pakatan Harapan (PH), needs to ensure allocations for areas represented by the Opposition, as pledged in their manifesto.

"We must progress, and political parties can no longer rely on outdated tactics.

"Even areas governed by the Opposition have voters from the ruling party.

"The population should not suffer from a lack of allocation," he added.