Appeals court restores trader's 10 year jail sentence for sexual assault on step-daughter

29 Sep 2023 04:55pm
Picture for illustrative purposes - FILE PIX
Picture for illustrative purposes - FILE PIX
PUTRAJAYA - The Court of Appeal here today restored the Sessions Court decision in sentencing a trader to 10 years imprisonment for committing physical sexual assault on his 12-year-old stepdaughter.

The 40-year-old man will also be given four strokes of the cane.

This followed a decision by the Court of Appeal's three-man bench comprising Justices Datuk Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera, Datuk Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Datuk S.M. Komathy Suppiah in allowing the prosecution’s appeal to restore the Sessions Court decision.

The prosecution’s appeal was against the High Court decision which had reduced the man’s jail sentence to seven years jail.

In setting aside the High Court’s decision, Justice Vazeer said the High Court made an error when reducing the prison sentence from 10 years to seven years.

He said the seven-year jail term was low and that the High Court should consider the relationship between the victim and the offender.

Considering the trend of sentencing, a 10-year imprisonment sentence is appropriate for the offence, he said.

On July 15, 2021, the man pleaded guilty to two counts of committing physical sexual assault on the primary six student in a house in Banting, Selangor on April 17 and May 9, the same year and the Sessions Court sentenced him to 10 years in jail with two strokes of the cane for each count.

He was ordered to serve the sentences concurrently which means that he has to serve 10 years in jail and be given four strokes of the cane.
Related Articles:


The charge was framed under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and read together with Section 16(1) of the same law. Section 14 (a) provides a maximum jail sentence of 20 years and whipping, upon conviction.

On June 28 last year, the High Court allowed the man’s appeal and reduced his jail term to seven years. The court maintained the whipping sentence. This prompted the prosecution to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Deputy public prosecutor P. Sarulatha said the High Court did not take into account Section 16 (1) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 201.

The section states that a person in a relation of trust with the child, in addition to the punishment to which he is liable for such offence, be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years in jail and shall be punished with whipping of not less than two strokes.

Lawyer Muhamad Izwan Ishak from the National Legal Aid Foundation, who represented the man, urged the court to maintain the seven years jail.

He cited a case where an accused person facing similar charges as his client was sentenced to eight years in jail by the Ipoh High Court - BERNAMA